@Article{Heyl_Backofen-Stoat_Evalu_and-2021, author = {Heyl, Florian and Backofen, Rolf}, title = {{StoatyDive}: {Evaluation} and classification of peak profiles for sequencing data}, journal = {Gigascience}, year = {2021}, volume = {10}, number = {6}, pages = {}, user = {backofen}, pmid = {34143874}, doi = {10.1093/gigascience/giab045}, issn = {2047-217X}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: The prediction of binding sites (peak-calling) is a common task in the data analysis of methods such as cross-linking immunoprecipitation in combination with high-throughput sequencing (CLIP-Seq). The predicted binding sites are often further analyzed to predict sequence motifs or structure patterns. When looking at a typical result of such high-throughput experiments, the obtained peak profiles differ largely on a genomic level. Thus, a tool is missing that evaluates and classifies the predicted peaks on the basis of their shapes. We hereby present StoatyDive, a tool that can be used to filter for specific peak profile shapes of sequencing data such as CLIP. FINDINGS: With StoatyDive we are able to classify peak profile shapes from CLIP-seq data of the histone stem-loop-binding protein (SLBP). We compare the results to existing tools and show that StoatyDive finds more distinct peak shape clusters for CLIP data. Furthermore, we present StoatyDive's capabilities as a quality control tool and as a filter to pick different shapes based on biological or technical questions for other CLIP data from different RNA binding proteins with different biological functions and numbers of RNA recognition motifs. We finally show that proteins involved in splicing, such as RBM22 and U2AF1, have potentially sharper-shaped peaks than other RNA binding proteins. CONCLUSION: StoatyDive finally fills the demand for a peak shape clustering tool for CLIP-Seq data that fine-tunes downstream analysis steps such as structure or sequence motif predictions and that acts as a quality control.} }